Monday, November 21, 2016

American Revolution 2.0: American Revolution 2.0

American Revolution 2.0: American Revolution 2.0: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unali...

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

An Outrage! Out of Control Child Support Government Agencies! This is Jerry Springer Show Material!

Well, you probably won't believe me when I tell you, my readers, about the stories I have been hearing about the horrible, terrible child support cases going on in this nation - especially here in the great state of Missouri (which lately is not so much).

Did you know that the only court in the nation - the family law courts - DO NOT demand proof of paternity and take the mother's word that some such person is the father of her babies?  NO PROOF REQUIRED.  The court takes the word of the mother on face value - without any type of proof to support her claims of paternity.  NO PROOF!  If that isn't the most ridiculous item of the day.  And, worse, these alleged "fathers" are being jailed and their financial lives ruined all because of this insane and corrupt and reprobate system.

I am not at all saying that parents shouldn't support their kids.  All I am saying is that men who are NOT fathering children should not be paying child support on a child that is NOT their own.  The biological father should be the one paying - regardless of whether the mother is married to someone else or not (or was married and having an affair) OR JUST PLAIN LYING ABOUT THE PATERNITY OF THE CHILD.


I have a friend, whom I will address as Mr X.  Mr X was dating a girl back in 1995.  They dated and had intercourse.  Later, they broke up but had never colluded to form a family or have a child together.  Months later, she left for another state and said called saying she was going to have a baby. Perhaps it is his child.  BUT perhaps not.

Later, in the other state, she filed for child support.  My friend wanted a paternity test and submitted blood work on the order of the other state.  But, the mother never did submit the child for testing.


Our attorney, Craig, got the case dismissed (but not permanently) in Missouri.  It was dismissed without prejudice.

During our meeting with him, he mentioned that there have been numerous men who have committed suicide because the child support issue is so bad here.


My friend, Mr X, has been sending correspondence to the state where the mother resides now.  Their response: A child support bill.  All of his legal arguments and reasons not to pay until a paternity test could settle the matter had been ignored.

Just recently, we had sent the following correspondence (to no avail):

In the Matter of:
Petitioner XXXXXX
& Mr X
Case #:  XXXXX
To Whom It May Concern:
Please be advised that this case is also connected to Case #: XXXX (which was dismissed).  (See attachment A).
I contend that I do not owe any such child support and contest any amount owed to Petitioner XXXXXX.
My rights have been disregarded on multiple occasions regarding this matter and I have repeatedly demanded that paternity be established with regard to my rights under the following statute:
15 U.S.C. § 1681 (“FCRA”) 622
The State of X has repeatedly reported the amount due to the national credit bureaus in the amount of $166,781.29.  This is intentional credit interference with my credit expectancy.  As the law requires, this arrearage may only be reported once proof of such a claim has been established.  The only way proof can possibly be established is by the execution of a paternity test.
I also dispute the fact that the arrearage amount is a completely arbitrary amount that was fabricated by the courts and that the amount due is fraudulent and that no proof of income was ever used (nor any formula ever disclosed to me) in how this figure was calculated.
Furthermore, I have never claimed to be the father of the child in question.  I have never claimed to have had a right to the child or invited the child to be part of my life in anyway.  This would have been impossible as the mother of the child, Petitioner XXXXXX relocated to X and after having the child, only then advised me (nearly a year later) that she had a child.  I have no way of knowing whether the child, in question, is actually my own.
I do not believe that child support should be enforced for the reasons that:
(1) Paternity has never been established (even though I had submitted to DNA testing several times) and Petitioner XXXXXX refused or failed to submit the child for same.
(2) Petitioner XXXXXX denied me of my right to know whether or not the child is indeed my own.
(3) Petitioner XXXXXX denied me the chance to see the child in question.
(4) Petitioner XXXXXX also relocated to another state without my knowledge or agreement.
According to the following legal opinion on matters of paternity and child support (with which I fully agree) states:
Determining the answer to the seemingly simple question "Who is the father?" is not as straightforward as you might think. Different circumstances give rise to different legal rules.
When Paternity Is Agreed On or Presumed
Acknowledged father. An acknowledged father is a biological father of a child born to unmarried parents, for whom paternity has been established by either the admission of the father or the agreement of the parents. An acknowledged father must pay child support.
Presumed father. If any of the following are true, a man is presumed to be the father of a child, unless he or the mother proves otherwise to a court:
The man was married to the mother when the child was conceived or born, although some states do not consider a man to be a presumed father if the couple has separated.
The man attempted to marry the mother (even if the marriage was not valid) and the child was conceived or born during the attempted marriage.
The man married the mother after the birth and agreed either to have his name on the birth certificate or to support the child.
The man welcomed the child into his home and openly held the child out as his own.
In some states, any of these presumptions of paternity is considered conclusive, which means it cannot be disproven, even with contradictory blood tests. In Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld California's presumed father statute as a rational method of protecting the integrity of the family against challenges based on the due process rights of the father and the child.
A presumed father must pay child support.
Equitable parent. The law has changed a great deal in the last decade, and now in quite a few states, a spouse who is not a legal parent (biological or adoptive) may be granted custody or visitation under the notion of equitable parent. Courts apply this concept when a spouse and child have a close relationship and consider themselves parent and child or where the biological parent encouraged this relationship. If the court grants an equitable parent custody or visitation, then the parent will also be required to pay child support. This type of parentage decision occurs frequently in cases where same-sex couples are parenting together. 
Alleged father. An unmarried man who impregnates a woman is often referred to as an alleged father, or sometimes simply as an unwed father. An alleged or unwed father will be required to pay child support if a court determines or he acknowledges that he's the father; in addition, an alleged or unwed father has the right to visitation with his child and may seek custody.
Stepfather. A stepfather is the spouse of a legal mother and is not also the biological father of the woman's children. A stepfather is not obligated to support the children of the woman to whom he is married unless he legally adopts the children.
Paternity Actions
A paternity action, a court suit filed to have a man declared the father of a child, can be brought by either the mother or the father. Paternity actions are sometimes called establishment hearings, filiation hearings, or parentage actions.
Most paternity actions are initiated by welfare officials who provide TANF (Temporary Aid to Needy Families) to the mother and are required by law to seek reimbursement from the father. The mother must cooperate in these proceedings; failure to do so can result in a reduction or loss of her TANF grant.
Today, blood and DNA tests can affirmatively determine paternity with a 99.99% accuracy and can rule out paternity with 100% accuracy.
If paternity is established following a paternity action, the court will order the father to pay child support and grant him custody or visitation rights.
I declare that I do not fit lawfully into any of these categories as defined by legal definition.
Petitioner XXXXXX and myself never established a “family relationship” and that no “family” has ever existed between  myself and Petitioner XXXXXX.
Furthermore, if I am required by the State of X and/or the State of Missouri to pay this child support without having a paternity test to determine whether or not I am the biological father, then I will sue both the State of X and Missouri for the following amounts in question:
(1) Actual damages in the amount of $333,352.58 ($166,781,29 from each state)
(2) Punitive damages in the amount of 10x the amount rewarded by the courts from the State of X in which was arbitrarily decided by the courts for denying my rights to have a paternity test denied me ($3,335,625.80).
(3) Punitive damages from the State of X and the State of Missouri in the amount of 10x the amount of the paternity arrearage due ($3,335,625.80) with regard to the legal concept of, “Interference with Credit Expectancy”.
(4) Punitive damages from both the State of X and the State of Missouri for harassment and causing me undue economic hardship and emotional duress regarding the harassment I have received over the past 15 years regarding this nonsense ($3,335,625.80).
(5) I will also sue for complete expungement of the derogatory information contained in the public record regarding this child support issue as it has unjustly (even until now) damaged my reputation and defamed my personhood.  For this defamation of character, I will sue both the State of X and the State of Missouri ($3,335,625.80) for this injustice.
(6) I motion that this court action be immediately dismissed WITH PREJUDICE by both the State of X and the State of Missouri without further delay, and, in exchange, I may elect not to sue for damages.
Unfortunately, Mr X had since gotten a job at a local retailer and now the child support is now being deducted from his check: $1,200 monthly AND WITHOUT PROOF OF A BLOOD TEST!  Now, he's been dealing this for nearly 20(+) years now and I have tried to help him as best as I can with his situation.

Now, we are asking for $10,000,000 for each year he has been mistreated during this ordeal and denied his right to a paternity test.  Why so much?  Because if you don't sue for a huge sum of money, it won't get the state's attention and they will keep abusing citizens and all without the consideration of a blood test.

Another Attorney

Gary is a great family law attorney.  But, what he told us was enough to make me vomit.  He said that the judges are "immune" from harm because they "rely" on the claims of the mother.  Blood tests are not primarily required.  A simple statement is mostly all that is required AND WITHOUT PROOF.

Funny.  I disagree that a government can be immune from their actions.  The state IS NEVER immune to mistreating and falsely imprisoning their citizens.  All courts MUST run on EVIDENCE. It is evidence that decides the matter - in this case, a simple blood test.

I stated that Lincoln, at the Gettysburg Address, uttered the words, "a government of the people, by the people and for the people" is what true governance is.  Since Abraham Lincoln said this, it is taken as a form of "agency law" with respect to the government handling the affairs of the people. Anything less is a system of corruption, abuse of power and lack of due care.  GOVERNMENT IS ALWAYS ANSWERABLE TO THE PEOPLE.  The government has a fiduciary duty to act with due care with regard to all of their citizens.  Failure to do so places the states at terrible financial and legal risk (as in this case).

Getting Yet Another Attorney

Mr X is now in the process of hiring another attorney in another state to get this case dismissed. Then, we will need to locate another one to file the civil suit.  So, stay tuned...


Mr X told me about another case whereby a mother of 3 children filed for child care against 3 men WITHOUT PROOF.  Then she changed the names of the babies and then filed another 3 claims against another 3 men.  She did it again one more time and got caught collecting 9 child support checks from 9 men for 3 babies.  The state caught on to her shenanigans and she is now serving 18 years in prison.


In yet another case, a white mother got pregnant by an African American and filed for child support for the child against the white male.  The kid didn't look anything like the father, and being black, it was plain to see.  He (the alleged father) hired a private investigator and, by bringing his findings, she went to prison for fraud.


Write your congresspersons:

Tell them how wrong this really is!  Family court is the only court in America where PROOF OF PATERNITY ISN'T REQUIRED.

Michael Hathman

Saturday, July 23, 2016

An Open Letter to Donald Trump and the GOP

Dear Mr. Trump & the GOP,

Please know that first and foremost, I am a Christian and a Patriot before I am a Democrat, Independent or Republican.  And, being such, I cannot and will not stay silent.

I understand frustration and why people want to vote for an "outsider" and it makes sense.  People are tired of the "old" system of government where lobbyists and billionaires set the agenda.   The voters are tired of seeing criminal banksters run free from prosecution.  We, the People, are tired of seeing mass shootings and tired of seeing government deny assistance to the mentally unstable, unwilling to fund mental health (none of which has been addressed in this campaign).


None of this is being addressed as it should...

We are tired of political correctness.

We deny the mentally ill access to adequate healthcare.

Since 1963, we took the Bible out of schools and omitted teaching ethics and wisdom to our children.

Our society has the highest incarceration rate in the entire world and we are #1 with prison population (55,000,000).

We are #1 in terms of massive litigation with 100,000,000 cases filed each year.

We spend more on defense than the next 25 nations combined.

We lead the world #1 in production of pornography.

Drug cartels of Mexico and South America flood our streets with drugs.

Our educational system has broken down and bullying and harassment and disobedience has become the norm.

We have a "delegate system" in both parties when all that is required is state primaries overseen by the Secretaries of State.

We produce the largest number of television shows that show, without end, the destruction of human lives and murder dramas.

Our nation is obese.

Racism has made its return (in a big way).

Our cops are abused in many cases, and in many cases, our society abuses our cops more than one way - by the people and the government.

We have allowed teen pregnancy to fester and allowed "abortion on demand" to be the answer.

We have 2 parties - both of whom have little regard for the moderate majority.

The young have become lazy and don't want to work.

We teach people that debt and credit are the "easy way" to get what you want.

Our nation has the #1 divorce rate in the world.  A lot of this has to do with being selfish than anything else such as feminism.

We lead the world in STD - with 1 in 3 Americans affected.

We burden our students with too much debt on student loans.

Too many people in our nation would rather have the sick die than spend "good money" to heal.

We would rather give huge sums of money away in foreign aid than enable our poor here in out country to be better off and well-adjusted.

The government has become overly oppressive - especially to the poor with regard to paying fines and jailing people when they don't or can't pay.  They have gone "overboard" on grass cutting fees and zoning requirements.

Common Core - a method of teaching craziness.

We are not a friendly, forgiving or welcoming nation to immigrants and would rather turn to xenophobia.

We have become a nation obsessing over guns and yet we are failing to keep them out of the hands of criminals and the criminally insane.

We would rather read fiction than read good books that improve the mind and soul.

We spend more time with our technology than with each other.

We start wars that, somehow, we can't finish.


You say, Mr. Trump, that you want to "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN"?  Really?  How about teaching our people ethics and the soundness of good, moral character.  This one simple solution is would, for the most part, nearly cure all of America's problems.

You say you would make a "GREAT" leader and you would be the best.  I find that hard to believe when your party acts as hateful as you do sir (and yet they maintain to mostly be Christians).

Showing a person mutual respect is one of the prime indicators that you are a Christian. Furthermore, your party calls itself "REPUBLICAN" and is representing the will of constituents everywhere and is open to dialogue, discussion and compromise.  Compromise is a central ingredient to a healthy, strong relationship and part of the process of moving forward in UNITY.  That is why your party isn't unified and is against other groups of people - IT'S SIMPLY BECAUSE YOU FAIL TO UNDERSTAND THE BASIC PHILOSOPHY OF MUTUAL RESPECT AND COMPROMISE.

The problem isn't Democrats sir or, even liberals.  The problem is ethics and compromise and understanding the limits of government in the lives of the governed.  We have failed miserable as a country when it comes to mutual respect, extolling wisdom and ethics. That's where the failures lie. A people without ethics is a lawless brood.

I would like to add that your ideas of "rounding up" illegals and deporting them comes very, closely similar to what the Nazis did with the Jews in the 1930's and 40's.  The idea is eerily similar to those events.  And, with the national media bring up the word, "nationalist" almost makes us look intolerant, arrogant and very unfriendly.  That isn't and will never be what America is.  America is far more than our nation, it is "idea" where truth, wisdom, justice and ethics prevail as well as opportunity.


We were formally a nation that stood up for what is right, what is moral.  We weren't afraid in doing so.  Acting in a moral way is just as important as talking about it.  So, I will leave you with these quotes as thoughts to ponder:

“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”  (John 13: 34-35)

“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven."  (Matthew 5:43-44)

"For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in,"  (Matthew 25:35)

“The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’" (Matthew 25:40)

Monday, April 18, 2016

Modern American Politics & Hitler

Hitler is no doubt considered to be the world's greatest and most infamous villain.  And, having said this, he is typically the standard by which we gauge the speech and actions of American politicians.  It is also for this reason that we stand to compare him with politicians we prefer to dislike.  Even though, in some ways, Stalin and Tse Tung were just as villainous or even more so.

Time and time again, we see - somewhere in the long posts of social media - a side-by-side comparison of some politician who eerily states something very much similar to Adolf Hitler.  Hardly ever do we see a pictorial wherein Stalin or Mao Tse Tung is the villain of choice.  But that does happen too.

A Modern Monstrosity

Why do we see this so much?  And why does Hitler stand as a monstrosity, not over just the last century, but this century too?  His gargantuan shadow casts forth its darkness into the hearts of who love individual liberty and into the nightmarish dreams of what could be again - a terrible and dark history repeating itself - right here in America.  So shuddering is the idea of Nazism, there was a film made about it in 1994 called, Fatherland.

The Smallest Seeds

Perhaps we are so engaged and locked on the issues of Nazism that we find that, even the smallest similarity could bring about mass destruction, war, chaos as well as another holocaust.  But, the idea is not too far from the truth.  Small things start with the mildest of insinuations, accusations, the smallest deeds of slandering and libel.  That's how it all starts.  Books, literature, films, ideas in such a way that the smallest rumblings lead to the greatest of political upheavals.  And we, the American People, are terrified of the notion that such Nazism and such horror could ever materialize here.  But, we will get to that notion a little later...

Ever hear of one of the most plausible (and yet most ridiculous and unlikely) of scientific ideas?  It's the idea that, on the microcosmic scale, great things begin to occur?  For instance, could flap of a butterfly's wings ultimately "stir up" a hurricane?  Perhaps only God knows for certain.  But, in the case of politics, the idea that is real and powerful.  It only takes one idea to take root and then there is the one plant, then the garden, then the field, then the forests... ever creeping, ever conquering one square inch at a time.

Libensraum ("Living Space")

This was the Nazi idea of taking land from other people and nations so that the Great Germanic Northern People might have more living space to farm, live and play.  Indeed, the conquering of these other lands was akin to the idea of making such a "space" to "heaven on earth" and it was an appealing idea to the Nazis.

A Word About Acting Like A President & Being Presidential: Looking Back at Ronald Reagan As A Role Model

Being "presidential" really does mean everything that it connotes.  Indeed, the connotation of being "presidential" is being professional and to act with professional decorum.

The site, states the meaning as an adjective:
Adj. presidential, relating to a president, or presidency; presidential; befitting a president; looking presidential; statesmanlike.

Indeed, the whole idea of being "presidential" is to act like a statesperson.  Indeed, a president absolutely must act as his own foreign dignitary and it is absolutely a requirement of the job that such a person act with a sense of dignity and respect.  In general, the American People usually require it to be a "MUST HAVE" as part of the job requirement.

This means that such a person would have to "act with class" without exception and to be professional at all times.  It also requires that a such a person not use profanity, invoke "locker room humor", be crass or be abrasive and reviling in behavior.  I was just 13 years old when Ronald Reagan took office.

What If the Government...

Judge Napolitano did a "What If" series on the government and the Constitution.  He inspired me so much that I wrote a list of questions...

- WHAT IF your rights have been marginalized and you didn't know it?
- WHAT IF you really don't have any rights?
- WHAT IF it was the government who chose to give you your rights and decided arbitrarily what those rights were?
- WHAT IF the right to privacy no longer mattered?
- WHAT IF the rights, you thought you had, turn out to be more of an assumption than a fact?
- WHAT IF you don't know your rights?
- WHAT IF the Constitution has been suspended by the 2 parties who mostly hold power over the government and we didn't know it and they didn't care tell the public?
- WHAT IF the government no longer agreed with our Founding Fathers that the people serve the government instead of the other way around?
- WHAT IF the people who hold office in the government refused to leave when asked or were voted out of office?
- WHAT IF the people who hold government (and engaging in criminal behavior) currently refused to leave their office when required to do by the police or majority of citizens?
- WHAT IF the government felt that the Declaration of Independence was so revolutionary that they "censored" it in schools because if anyone really did try to overthrow a corrupt government, that action would be construed as an insurrection or as an act of treason (on any municipal, county, state or federal level)?

Sunday, April 17, 2016

2 Extremes & Too Extreme: Today's Politics: We the People - American Center Party

We are at a time in our nation's history where we need to make a choice.  We can allow fringe politics, extremism, hatred, division and deadlock ensue and gridlock progress for our government and for our nation.  We can choose the policies of hate, derisive gridlock, division and the "them against us" mentality which will get us absolutely nowhere.
Or, we can do something better.  We can provide a more moderate, more sensible form of government with policies that make more sense and reflect the realities of today's American Families.  We need to stop letting lobbyists hijack our government, billionaires dictate policy and dark money throw a shadow of influence over the people without disclosure from where this influence is coming.

I propose the following policies be adopted (they are moderate - so both sides should be able to "cope" with the "middle ground" so that we can get things done.
Please understand I am writing this as a Christian but also as a Secular Constitutionalist.

Jobs & Economy Policy
We need to fix the crumbling infrastructure of our nation.  This will provide many, many jobs and reinvigorate the economy.
Instead of giving more and more tax breaks to the super rich and multi-national conglomerates, let's make policies and give financial support to small businesses (which already account for 80% of the nation's economy).  This may mean loans and grants for small businesses should be available.
Let's invest in Research & Development - especially in medical research - even if it means the government should spend in this area to keep America strong and competitive in world markets.

THE MOST IMPORTANT US INDUSTRY: Agriculture.  Let's implement plans, protocols and financial assistance to our nation's farmers to insure that tomorrow night our families can eat well.  Let's keep agriculture strong and growing.
Let's stop allowing businesses to relocate overseas and taking jobs with them when they go.  Let's create incentives to get them to stay and keep doing business here in the USA.

Defense Policy Spending
It accounts for 55% of our national budget.  Let's cut in half.  Here's how:
(1)  Let's get other nations to pay for our overseas bases.  We sell them on them paying for the bases we are operating in dozens of nations worldwide.  They PAY for #1 world class United States Defense and troops.  We keep the bases open at THEIR expense - NOT ours.
(2)  Let's stop wasting money.  We already wasted 1.5 TRILLION dollars on a failed airplane.  ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.  (DOD Stuck With A Flawed 1.5 Trillion Fighter Jet)
(3)  Let's stop needless and senseless wars.  War is a act of last resort and should only be launched when America is directly, and immediately threatened or attacked.
(4)  Let's stop building more and more bombs and missiles.

Foreign Aid
Let's stop sending hundreds of billions of dollars to foreign countries and we get absolutely NOTHING IN RETURN.  Let's use that money to reinvest here in America.  We can create education programs to lift families out of poverty, reduce blight in our cities, promote affordable housing and so much more.

Let's find a common ground where we can make healthcare more affordable for the American People. Currently American Business loses about a half trillion dollars on personnel sick days every single year. So, we are already paying deeply for those costs ( US Workforce Illness Costs Over Half Trillion Annually ).
(1)  As New York City has rent control, the government can put a "cap" on products (including medications), services and care. This will suppress costs.  Additionally, having a comparative pricing program for products, services and care where consumers can compare prices from anything to having a EKG to delivering a baby will allow for more competition as prices, services and care can be carefully compared on consumer websites.  Wider competition should be able to suppress prices even lower.
(2)  Have American consumers pay up to $300 for care within a year and $300 for medication (unless they have insurance or a discount health plan).  Anything over this amount, the government can subsidize.
(3)  On catastrophic care, American consumers can pay up to $1,000 on payments with the government to pick up the costs on the difference via subsidies.
(4)  Government cap should be placed on healthcare premiums to make premiums affordable for most American families.
(5)  Government cap should be placed on actual and punitive damages for various medical malpractice suits.
(6)  Government caps should be placed on pharmaceutical companies for various drugs for various diseases and calculate what "constitutes" a "fair" profit in order to discourage gouging.
These kinds of practices should discourage system abuses and encourage and foster fair trade and fair commerce and bolster economic competition.
Finally, such steps allow for all Americans to take ownership and it allows them to invest in their own health without opening up a healthcare system to widespread abuse and fraud.

Ethics, Legalism Required Learning
(1)  Ethics should be taught in schools.  A course requirement should be required in elementary, high school and college.  This should massively reduce violence in schools - including school shootings as well as bullying.
(2)  Let students hold other students accountable by allowing them to have a "student court" where students can learn the gist of "lawful" student self-governance.  When a student misbehaves, the "student court" can issue the punishment accordingly.  This may also bring in conceptual studies allowing the students to see the United States Constitution in action.  Of course, such school programs could help be structured by a licensed attorney - possibly through corporate-school programs that promote student understanding of commerce.

Social Matters (In General)
Since social matters are mostly a private affair, such matters need to decided on an individual basis and without government intrusion or intervention.
Abortion should be allowed in cases of pressing medical matters, rape and/or incest, therefore, should be wholly decided by patient (or the victim and the victim's immediate family).
Marriage should be decided between 2 persons regardless of the objections to other outside parties - especially the government.

Government Regulation
While it is in the best interest of commerce, in general, to be free of draconian and heavy government regulation, limited regulation (both with regard to scope and magnitude) is still required - especially in light of the frauds committed during the 2000 "cooking the books" fiascos of Enron and MCI and the 2007-08 Financial Collapse.  American government must strike a fair (and limited) balance to regulating the economy so that the American consumers and the nation, as a whole, is protected at all times from careless and criminal acts of businessmen in general.

Immigration & Building A Wall
Rounding up people who are already living here illegally is not fiscally sound.  Instead, by granting amnesty and enrolling 10,000,000 illegal immigrants as paying American citizens into the tax pool, could raise as much as $56,000,000,000 a year in additional tax revenue just on the Federal basis.  This additional income would greatly help the border states with additional state income which is probably desperately needed.
Additionally, farmers and local economies depend on these people already settled here for the additional economic stimulus on which the travel and agricultural industries rely.
Building a "wall", per se, may not be feasible.  Mexico is a sovereign nation and will most likely refuse to pay for the construction of such an undertaking.  Having a double fence, with barbed wire at the top (some - or all - of which may be electrified) with lookout towers spaced evenly apart maybe an option.  Of course, there are probably extremists who would rather have something akin to the "Great Wall of China" and similarly equipped like the Maginot Line of France (including landmines and sub machine guns).

In Conclusion
We need a party that can lead (not by the fringes) but with leadership and mental toughness.

Saturday, April 16, 2016

The Last Republican Presidency Was the Single Greatest Failure In American History: Why Americans Don't Want A Repeat!


The LAST REPUBLICAN PRESIDENCY ended being the greatest failure in American history.

Even if you take the WORST 10 Presidents combined, it still wouldn't equal the massive and complete failure of the Bush Presidency.

(1) The 2000 "Cook the Books" Fiasco led to the greatest series of Corporate Collapses in American history including companies like Enron and MCI Telecomm.
(2) The 2001 9/11 Terrorist Attacks were the worst in history.
(3) The Terrorist Attacks usher in the 2001 Recession.
(4) The Iraq & Afghanistan Wars start and end up costing the American People $3,000,000,000,000 with Dick Cheney's company Halliburton racking in billions of dollars in tax payer income only to find out the reasons for the wars are based on LIES. No one is prosecuted. The Middle East is left is mass chaos (still).
(4) 2007-08 Crash cost approximately $16,000,000,000,000,000 to correct.
(5) Millions and millions of jobs are lost in the greatest economic collapse in modern world history.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

Top 100 Countdown of Funniest Political Sayings

100. I am intolerant of intolerance.

99. I'm offended.

98. He lied.

97. She lied.

96. Lying liars!

95. All hail King Obama!

94. All hail King Bush!

93. When are they jailing Dick Cheney?

92. Clown Car...

91. Political Correctness is correct.

90. Political correctness be damned!

89. We the People don't like you!

88. She's wingbat crazy.

87. You can keep your insurance.

86. Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran!

85. Political quacks!

84. Too liberal!

83. Too conservative!

82. Communists!

81. Socialists!

80. I'm so sick and tired hearing about e-mails!

79. We need 10,000 more committees formed to deal with Benghazi.

78. If you don't do politics, politics will do you.

77. When did crazy become mainstream?

76. Fringe.

75. Crazies.

74. Nuts.

73. Wing nuts.

72. Corruption charges.

71. Weiner.

70. Fox News lies.

69. Godless

68. Republican Party

67. GOP

66. Does he actually believe all that he's talking about?

65. Lazy!

64. Did I say crazy?

63. Can he be trusted?

62. They lied.

61. Whatever!

60. You can't be serious!

59. Um, she didn't didn't just say that?

58. Never estimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

59. Politicians and diapers need to be changed... often... and for the same reason.

58. There is a break with reality.

57. Make America White Again.

56. Not incompetent. Just unable to do the job.

55. Really?

54. You can't say that.

53. Is he crazy?

52. Your thoughts?

51. Can't we all just get along?

50. Another government shutdown?

49. Overspending.

48. They want a war again?

47. Been there... done that!

46. They can't be serious!?

45. Political scientists do it better.

44. Climate Change!

43. I'm smiling.

42. I'm laughing.

41. I can't stop laughing.

40. They can't get their act together.

39. They bought the politicians.

38. Lobbyists own the government.

37. Corporations write bills sent to Congress.

36. Banks write bills.

35. They went off the deep end, didn't they?

34. Ridiculous!

33. So ridiculous!

32. So unbelievably ridiculous!

31. You can't be serious!

30. Don't go there...

29. Crazy!

28. Loony!

27. Well, well, well...

26. Fox News propaganda...

25. It's another election year!

24. Too divisive...

23. Can't we all just get along?

22. Tea Party Crazies!

21. Too liberal!

20. How do you define socialist?

19. Climbing the Appalachian Trail

18. Natural born citizen...

17. Where's the birth certificate?

16. Make America White Again

15. I can't believe he just said that?

14. Where do we go from here?

13. What's he talking about?

12. We need more hearings on Benghazi.

11. Why am I laughing?

10. They're drug traffickers, they're rapists...

9. Let's build a wall.

8. It'll be great!

7. I'll be great!

6. It'll be amazing!

5. He's a loser!

4. King Obama

3. Why is he smiling?

2. That's disgusting!

1. You can trust me.